Check out Landscape Photography section of our forum.
Oh Nooo! Chemtrails!
May 27, 2014 13:06:03 #
http://thevane.gawker.com/why-i-write-about-and-debunk-the-chemtrail-conspiracy-1581896346
Because the HAARPies are going to try to find something else to whine about now...
Because the HAARPies are going to try to find something else to whine about now...
May 27, 2014 14:25:02 #
n3eg wrote:
http://thevane.gawker.com/why-i-write-about-and-debunk-the-chemtrail-conspiracy-1581896346
Because the HAARPies are going to try to find something else to whine about now...
Because the HAARPies are going to try to find something else to whine about now...
Jim Spencer, an Austin, Tx, weatherman was doing a segment on cloud seeding recently. He explained that there has been a lot of cloud seeding going on in Texas lately. Then he said, with a befuddled look on his face, "but you need clouds for that to work."
Dennis Mersereau's description of chemtrails being contrails doesn't make any sense at all. Temperatures at 30,000 ft range from -30 degrees to minus -70 degrees. Ice particles that are turned to steam by jet engines cause contrails. At those extremely low temperatures, the steam vapor refreezes quickly and the contrails disappear quickly. The trails that make up chentrails that we see so often now do not refreeze but usually spread out and form a hazy layer. They can reach entirely from horizon to horizon. Aluminum oxide has been said to make up most of the ingredients in the chemtrails.
Geoengineer David Keith explains to Stephen Colbert why chemtrails are necessary on this video:http://thecolbertreport.cc.com/videos/lv0hd2/david-keith
May 27, 2014 21:51:16 #
Not so fast, Larry.
Thunderstorm cold cloud tops reach almost 60,000 feet and -80C. They don't "refreeze and go away." Any exhaust has more water than what comes into the intake, so it makes "clouds."
But you can believe what you want. At least you're reading something, whatever that may be. Like I always say - I don't fear the illuminati, I fear the illiterati.
Thunderstorm cold cloud tops reach almost 60,000 feet and -80C. They don't "refreeze and go away." Any exhaust has more water than what comes into the intake, so it makes "clouds."
But you can believe what you want. At least you're reading something, whatever that may be. Like I always say - I don't fear the illuminati, I fear the illiterati.
Check out Street Photography section of our forum.
May 28, 2014 07:05:22 #
May 28, 2014 08:32:44 #
n3eg wrote:
Not so fast, Larry.
Thunderstorm cold cloud tops reach almost 60,000 feet and -80C. They don't "refreeze and go away." Any exhaust has more water than what comes into the intake, so it makes "clouds."
But you can believe what you want. At least you're reading something, whatever that may be. Like I always say - I don't fear the illuminati, I fear the illiterati.
Thunderstorm cold cloud tops reach almost 60,000 feet and -80C. They don't "refreeze and go away." Any exhaust has more water than what comes into the intake, so it makes "clouds."
But you can believe what you want. At least you're reading something, whatever that may be. Like I always say - I don't fear the illuminati, I fear the illiterati.
Thunderstorm clouds that reach altitudes higher than 30,000 feet carry much more moisture than cloudless sky. Clouds at that level don't have to refreeze because they are already frozen. They contain ice crystals or snow.
When a plane flies through cloudless skies the vapor trail should refreeze fairly quickly at -30 to -70 degrees. That always happened up until about a decade ago. Environmental scientists David Keith said our government has known about climate change since the 1950s. http://www.ted.com/talks/david_keith_s_surprising_ideas_on_climate_change
May 28, 2014 08:57:34 #
May 28, 2014 09:02:53 #
Pepper
Loc: Planet Earth Country USA
sr71 wrote:
Idiots will believe any thing.......
That's funny, I have a friend that is a design engineer for Boeing and I mentioned the chemtrail theory to him and he just laughed. It took him all of about 60 seconds to convince me that the chemtrail theory is for those who just can't live without the drama.
May 28, 2014 09:08:44 #
Pepper wrote:
That's funny, I have a friend that is a design engineer for Boeing and I mentioned the chemtrail theory to him and he just laughed. It took him all of about 60 seconds to convince me that the chemtrail theory is for those who just can't live without the drama.
Why don't you share what your Boeing engineer told you?
Does he know more than David Keith, the environmental scientist?
May 28, 2014 09:16:13 #
Pepper
Loc: Planet Earth Country USA
larrypayne wrote:
Why don't you share what your Boeing engineer told you?
Does he know more than David Keith, the environmental scientist?
Does he know more than David Keith, the environmental scientist?
First I don't have time and you'd only ridicule everything I say anyway or call me a liar and I don't need that this early.
Second question evidently he knows more about planes and how they operate and how a delivery system would have to operate.
May 28, 2014 09:29:46 #
Pepper wrote:
First I don't have time and you'd only ridicule everything I say anyway or call me a liar and I don't need that this early.
Second question evidently he knows more about planes and how they operate and how a delivery system would have to operate.
Second question evidently he knows more about planes and how they operate and how a delivery system would have to operate.
As usual, you refuse to back up your statements.
You don't have to prove anything to me.
You do owe it to readers to show that you weren't making up that story.
Your refusal to back up your statements is happening so often, I wonder if you even realize how that affects your credibility?
May 28, 2014 09:45:45 #
Pepper
Loc: Planet Earth Country USA
larrypayne wrote:
As usual, you refuse to back up your statements.
You don't have to prove anything to me.
You do owe it to readers to show that you weren't making up that story.
Your refusal to back up your statements is happening so often, I wonder if you even realize how that affects your credibility?
You don't have to prove anything to me.
You do owe it to readers to show that you weren't making up that story.
Your refusal to back up your statements is happening so often, I wonder if you even realize how that affects your credibility?
Look Larry, I'm here to enjoy convesing with fellow Hoggers and this is not a classroom or a courtroom. If you choose not to believe anything I say I really don't care. Hell Larry I believe very little of what you say even with all the bullshit links you throw around. When your at the coffee shop having a conversation do you demand proof and sources for everything your friends say? My god Larry get a grip.
Check out Bridge Camera Show Case section of our forum.
May 28, 2014 10:30:56 #
Pepper wrote:
Look Larry, I'm here to enjoy convesing with fellow Hoggers and this is not a classroom or a courtroom. If you choose not to believe anything I say I really don't care. Hell Larry I believe very little of what you say even with all the bullshit links you throw around. When your at the coffee shop having a conversation do you demand proof and sources for everything your friends say? My god Larry get a grip.
If I were having a conversation with friends I certainly would ask them to back up statements that didn't make sense.
I don't expect you to admit that you believe anything I post. I suspect you know that it's the truth. You're here to cover up the truth. That is obvious from the fact that you can never back up your statements.
Lies are difficult to source.
May 28, 2014 10:41:20 #
Pepper
Loc: Planet Earth Country USA
larrypayne wrote:
If I were having a conversation with friends I certainly would ask them to back up statements that didn't make sense.
I don't expect you to admit that you believe anything I post. I suspect you know that it's the truth. You're here to cover up the truth. That is obvious from the fact that you can never back up your statements.
Lies are difficult to source.
I don't expect you to admit that you believe anything I post. I suspect you know that it's the truth. You're here to cover up the truth. That is obvious from the fact that you can never back up your statements.
Lies are difficult to source.
What a sad little man you are Larry. You've been involved in your conspiracy shit for so long you've lost the ability to enjoy simple conversation. You trust no one and when one refuses to play by your rules you just start throwing out your standard insult and accusations. What funny is the number of posts I see from you complaining about those who insult you. You really should seek out some help Larry.
BTW Larry I'm just curious here are you telling me that I'm lying about having a friend? or a friend that works for Boeing? or that my friend is an engineer? or that I am lying about what he said? Just what am I lying about Larry? Secondly what makes you think you're so important to me that I'd sacrifice my integrity to lie to you? My god your ego is just so way out of whack Larry that I almost feel sorry for you.
May 28, 2014 10:42:44 #
I read somewhere that on 9/11 it was actually chemtrails that plowed into the Pentagon. rolls eyes
May 28, 2014 10:46:25 #
stevej49
Loc: Peachtree Corners, GA
I guess Boeing knows alot about Chentrails. During the Memorial Day weekend I was watching all the old WWll Movies. These were made from 1955 and before.. They also use a lot of real footage from the war. Funny thing, the B-17's seemed to leave contrails/chemtrails wayback then. When you put a couple hundred bombers together you get a lot of trails if the weather is right. Just sayin'
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Digital Artistry section of our forum.