Nobody Needs An AR15?
Sep 2, 2017 11:02:17 #
Sep 2, 2017 11:04:56 #
Sep 2, 2017 11:10:55 #
Sep 2, 2017 11:30:09 #
Sep 2, 2017 11:38:22 #
Every 2nd Amendment person needs an AR. Every 2nd Amendment person has a Constitutional right to own and use an AR, in fact if you read the Bill of Rights, and 2nd Amendment, no where does it specify you cannot own an M16 or M4, nor does it say you cannot own a Tank, rocket launcher or anything else the Liberals say no to.
Sep 2, 2017 11:48:22 #
ricardo7
Loc: Washington, DC - Santiago, Chile
My guess is that if tanks and rocket launchers were available to those who wanted
them, the number of candidates for the Darwin Awards would be overwhelming.
them, the number of candidates for the Darwin Awards would be overwhelming.
Sep 2, 2017 11:53:48 #
Ah, but the second amendment does not blatantly mandate or permit weapon ownership. It also makes owning a weapon a conditional with reference to being part of a well regulated m*****a.
To quote, "A well regulated M*****a, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed".
--Bob
To quote, "A well regulated M*****a, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed".
--Bob
Tet68survivor wrote:
Every 2nd Amendment person needs an AR. Every 2nd Amendment person has a Constitutional right to own and use an AR, in fact if you read the Bill of Rights, and 2nd Amendment, no where does it specify you cannot own an M16 or M4, nor does it say you cannot own a Tank, rocket launcher or anything else the Liberals say no to.
Sep 2, 2017 11:59:59 #
A Well Regulated M*****a is the citizenry, it is not National Guard as Liberals claim. When written, there was no National Guard there was only citizenry, you and me! You can read wh**ever you want into it, the unfortunate thing is, our Fore Fathers are not here to explain their idea! But I can and will say this, only out of my cold dead hands!
Sep 2, 2017 12:07:35 #
When someone tells you, "you don't need something, you can bet your life you need it!
Sep 2, 2017 12:10:44 #
By the way, there are "NO" conditions specified in the 2nd Anendment, as to licensing, tax, ownership etc. It is what Liberals think and want to control, by the way, as of today, I do not want to own a Tank or rocket launcher, but the day may be coming when it will be necessary!
Sep 2, 2017 12:11:19 #
Sep 2, 2017 12:18:07 #
rmalarz wrote:
As it happens, you are wrong. It has already been before the Supreme Court and they have declared that gun ownership is not dependent on belonging to a m*****a or the military.Ah, but the second amendment does not blatantly mandate or permit weapon ownership. It also makes owning a weapon a conditional with reference to being part of a well regulated m*****a.
To quote, "A well regulated M*****a, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed".
--Bob
To quote, "A well regulated M*****a, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed".
--Bob
Sep 2, 2017 12:22:30 #
Tet68survivor wrote:
By the way, there are "NO" conditions specified in the 2nd Anendment, as to licensing, tax, ownership etc. It is what Liberals think and want to control, by the way, as of today, I do not want to own a Tank or rocket launcher, but the day may be coming when it will be necessary!
Sep 2, 2017 12:22:34 #
David in Dallas wrote:
As it happens, you are wrong. It has already been before the Supreme Court and they have declared that gun ownership is not dependent on belonging to a m*****a or the military.
👍👍👍
Sep 2, 2017 12:23:58 #
I am a former Combat Vet, but now I do not belong to any Military group, I belong to the M*****a, the Citizens Army if you will!
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.