Gene51 wrote:
If you shoot raw, shooting jpeg is redundant, unless you have a need to immediately share your images. Also, if you are utilizing raw to its greatest advantage, settings that create a reasonable looking (not great) image may not fully exploit the RADR (raw accessible dynamic range). I would suggest you not even bother with jpeg unless you have to. You won't miss it. I've been shooting raw-only since 2006 and have not been inconvenienced at all. And I have done event photography, weddings and other high-volume, time sensitive photography. Not a problem in the least.
If you shoot raw, shooting jpeg is redundant, unle... (
show quote)
I guess that means you are using pre-sets to develop your RAWs - and turn them into JPGs. If so, that means your software is doing what the camera could do for you. You still have to store those developed pics as well as your original RAWs.