Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
Bill would direct FTC to censor advertising images
Page <prev 2 of 6 next> last>>
Apr 9, 2014 08:04:03   #
cheineck Loc: Hobe Sound, FL
 
It just "Big Brother" raising his ugly head.

Reply
Apr 9, 2014 08:13:44   #
Pepper Loc: Planet Earth Country USA
 
cheineck wrote:
It just "Big Brother" raising his ugly head.


Do you think these advertising moguls have a responsibility to at least attempt to be somewhat honest? If they won't police themselves don't you think the public has a right to be protected from what appear to be legal scam artists? Sometimes it's nice to have a "big brother". I do wish however that the "big brother" we refer to was a little more focused on us than himself.

Reply
Apr 9, 2014 08:56:24   #
cheineck Loc: Hobe Sound, FL
 
I still see it as a foot in the door of government control. I think the latest public outcry of altered images will promote self-governing of most industries, Hope so!

Reply
 
 
Apr 9, 2014 08:58:39   #
Pepper Loc: Planet Earth Country USA
 
cheineck wrote:
I still see it as a foot in the door of government control. I think the latest public outcry of altered images will promote self-governing of most industries, Hope so!


Me too, I'd much prefer self regulation and corporate responsibility but that doesn't seem to be the trend around the world now days. Here's to hoping.

Reply
Apr 9, 2014 09:27:20   #
JSPIRAKIS Loc: Florida
 
that's funny! They chose ugly pictures of Hillary? That's all I have ever seen!

Reply
Apr 9, 2014 09:53:18   #
amadjuster Loc: Amarillo, TX
 
JSPIRAKIS wrote:
that's funny! They chose ugly pictures of Hillary? That's all I have ever seen!


I'm not going to say it. I'm not going to say it. I'm not going to say it.

Reply
Apr 9, 2014 09:55:17   #
Red Bear
 
Pepper wrote:
Those car commercials are funny. You see SUVs climbing mountains, going through streams, climbing snow covered back roads and then you drive down the interstate in the winter and all kinds are stuck in the medium.


Just a thought here, from "Snow Country, USA." In Colorado, we assume that those SUV's in the median are driven by idiots. Many years ago, I took a new Jeep up the side of Pikes Peak that doesn't have a road - and promptly got arrested by Forest Rangers. But the machine could do it with a driver that knew how to do it. Almost every vehicle "drives" differently - there should be a mandatory driving class when you buy a new car. :thumbup:

Reply
 
 
Apr 9, 2014 10:20:05   #
davidrb Loc: Half way there on the 45th Parallel
 
Los-Angeles-Shooter wrote:
Use Photoshop: go to jail. The FTC already has many censorship and regulatory rules in place. For example, it is forbidden to use food photography (such as McDonalds hamburgers) which uses ingredients greater or different than that in the actual product. Anyhow, See below:


NEW BILL CALLS ON FTC TO TAKE ACTION ON PHOTOSHOPPED IMAGES

A coalition of advocates is urging Congress to require the FTC look into ways to reduce the use of images in advertising that have been altered by Photoshop.
The group, concerned about the effect of unrealistic body images on teens and children, is supporting a bill introduced March 27 by a Florida Congresswoman that would require the agency report on the use of altered images in advertisements and work with health and business experts and consumer advocates to devise new strategies to reduce their use.

“Our young people should be taught to lead healthy lifestyles, not to conform to advertiser’s fake idea of beauty,’’ said Congresswoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, the Florida Republican who introduced the bill.

The bill, called the Truth in Advertising Act, is supported by the American Medical Association (AMA), as well as a variety of women’s groups and advocates for the prevention of eating disorders.

The AMA adopted a policy in 2011 encouraging advertising associations to help develop guidelines that would discourage the use of such images, especially in teen-oriented publications. The AMA said:

A large body of literature links exposure to media-propagated images of unrealistic body images to eating disorders and other child and adolescent health problems.
Seth Matlins, a Los Angeles-based marketer who has worked in Hollywood most of his career, said the FTC has to take action to protect young consumers.

“Do I think the FTC has been doing enough? If we thought that we wouldn’t be doing this,’’ said Matlins. “It’s time the FTC stepped in.”

Matlins said the bill seeks to get at images that materially change an individual’s true shape, color, proportion or size, and is not after banning all Photoshopping. Matlins, who is a father of a young daughter and son and has been working on this legislation for three years, said the idea for the bill came after the U.K. banned two airbrushed L’Oreal magazine ads, one of Julia Roberts and one of Christy Turlington for being misleading. In 2012 the U.K.’s advertising regulatory body also banned a L’Oreal ad featuring Rachel Weisz.

“We don’t just buy products, we buy better versions of ourselves. But when our better selves doesn’t exist in nature…we are being sold a false bill of goods as empty as a bounced check,’’ said Matlins.“It’s time for the rules to change.”

Elizabeth Lordan, a spokeswoman for the FTC, said the agency has no comment or position on the bill. She said the agency doesn’t have a specific position on Photoshop, only that “our position on advertising is that it must be truthful, not deceptive or unfair, and evidence-based.”
Use Photoshop: go to jail. The FTC already has man... (show quote)


Was this hypocrite congresswoman wearing any "padded" apparel when she made this epic speech?

Reply
Apr 9, 2014 10:39:54   #
Red Bear
 
davidrb wrote:
Was this hypocrite congresswoman wearing any "padded" apparel when she made this epic speech?


That, sir, is beside the point; current ADVERTISING shows bodies that do not exist in nature; I have a granddaughter that grew up thinking that she needed legs for a 38 " inseam, a waist of about 16" and a bustline of 40." This stuff was going long before Photoshop (or whatever) but it still isn't right and can have drastic effects on impressionable young minds.

BTW, the granddaughter survived. Barely. And will be in counseling for years. And, still, now and then, "forgets" to eat for a few days.

Reply
Apr 9, 2014 10:52:37   #
bvm Loc: Glendale, Arizona
 
Frank T wrote:
What if you photoshopped someone to look worse than they actually do in reality. Would that still be a problem?
Actually, it takes a lot of nerve by members of congress to even present this bill considering most of them are photoshopped in their own publications..


Can you imagine what Mrs BO would look like without having been photoshopped? Same goes for Hillary.

They'd be the salt and peppa of Helen Thomas.

Look what they did for Nancy Pelosi!

Reply
Apr 9, 2014 10:55:32   #
Woodie Rick
 
Los-Angeles-Shooter wrote:
Use Photoshop: go to jail. The FTC already has many censorship and regulatory rules in place. For example, it is forbidden to use food photography (such as McDonalds hamburgers) which uses ingredients greater or different than that in the actual product. Anyhow, See below:


NEW BILL CALLS ON FTC TO TAKE ACTION ON PHOTOSHOPPED IMAGES

A coalition of advocates is urging Congress to require the FTC look into ways to reduce the use of images in advertising that have been altered by Photoshop.
The group, concerned about the effect of unrealistic body images on teens and children, is supporting a bill introduced March 27 by a Florida Congresswoman that would require the agency report on the use of altered images in advertisements and work with health and business experts and consumer advocates to devise new strategies to reduce their use.

“Our young people should be taught to lead healthy lifestyles, not to conform to advertiser’s fake idea of beauty,’’ said Congresswoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, the Florida Republican who introduced the bill.

The bill, called the Truth in Advertising Act, is supported by the American Medical Association (AMA), as well as a variety of women’s groups and advocates for the prevention of eating disorders.

The AMA adopted a policy in 2011 encouraging advertising associations to help develop guidelines that would discourage the use of such images, especially in teen-oriented publications. The AMA said:

A large body of literature links exposure to media-propagated images of unrealistic body images to eating disorders and other child and adolescent health problems.
Seth Matlins, a Los Angeles-based marketer who has worked in Hollywood most of his career, said the FTC has to take action to protect young consumers.

“Do I think the FTC has been doing enough? If we thought that we wouldn’t be doing this,’’ said Matlins. “It’s time the FTC stepped in.”

Matlins said the bill seeks to get at images that materially change an individual’s true shape, color, proportion or size, and is not after banning all Photoshopping. Matlins, who is a father of a young daughter and son and has been working on this legislation for three years, said the idea for the bill came after the U.K. banned two airbrushed L’Oreal magazine ads, one of Julia Roberts and one of Christy Turlington for being misleading. In 2012 the U.K.’s advertising regulatory body also banned a L’Oreal ad featuring Rachel Weisz.

“We don’t just buy products, we buy better versions of ourselves. But when our better selves doesn’t exist in nature…we are being sold a false bill of goods as empty as a bounced check,’’ said Matlins.“It’s time for the rules to change.”

Elizabeth Lordan, a spokeswoman for the FTC, said the agency has no comment or position on the bill. She said the agency doesn’t have a specific position on Photoshop, only that “our position on advertising is that it must be truthful, not deceptive or unfair, and evidence-based.”
Use Photoshop: go to jail. The FTC already has man... (show quote)


Well, nice thread. One Congresswoman? Why bother with an argument either way here, this bill would mess with corporate advertising, and it will not be given a hearing. Dustbin.

Reply
 
 
Apr 9, 2014 10:57:54   #
Pepper Loc: Planet Earth Country USA
 
bvm wrote:
Can you imagine what Mrs BO would look like without having been photoshopped? Same goes for Hillary.

They'd be the salt and peppa of Helen Thomas.

Look what they did for Nancy Pelosi!


While I'm not a fan of the Obamas I will tell you that I've seen Michelle in person and I can tell you she is an attractive woman. Hillary on the other hand, well it's my opinion that it's just more evidence that Bill was in fact doing drugs while in college.

Reply
Apr 9, 2014 11:26:16   #
Red Bear
 
Pepper wrote:
While I'm not a fan of the Obamas I will tell you that I've seen Michelle in person and I can tell you she is an attractive woman. Hillary on the other hand, well it's my opinion that it's just more evidence that Bill was in fact doing drugs while in college.


:lol: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Apr 9, 2014 11:33:24   #
Woodie Rick
 
Red Bear wrote:
:lol: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:


May be seeing more of her soon.

Reply
Apr 9, 2014 11:34:37   #
Red Bear
 
Woodie Rick wrote:
May be seeing more of her soon.


We're gonna be punished for bein' on UHH???

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 6 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.