Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Question about lens for indoor wedding shots
Page <<first <prev 3 of 5 next> last>>
May 21, 2014 09:58:29   #
ConnieLynn
 
check out borrowlenses.com. I was going to rent a lens from them for a wedding but it has been postponed. Shipping round trip plus the rental of the lens was around 85.00 total for I think around seven days.

Reply
May 21, 2014 10:00:13   #
Beercat Loc: Central Coast of California
 
Thanks all for the valuable suggestions.

I've shot wedding videos for over a decade, well over 200 weddings but we are now offering stills in a new 'combo' package. On combos we will have a 3rd shooter doing nothing but still work. However, I want to also shoot some stills from time to time.

I guess what I'm saying is I have a pretty goo idea of what I'm doing and what I need, just was looking for suggestions on a fast indoor lens that works well on a cropped 70D.

IMO, I can't understand anyone using a flash during the actual ceremony, very distracting .........

Reply
May 21, 2014 10:20:06   #
RichardSM Loc: Back in Texas
 
Beercat I'm wondering if you are just going to be setting in front row as you stated in an earlier post and not being the paid photographer if a P/S camera is a better bet for you something on the order of the GX1 from Canon it has the zoom ability and wide capabilities to do what you may want, as you say your DSLR with lenses suggested is to much from where you'll be shooting?

Reply
 
 
May 21, 2014 10:32:22   #
Beercat Loc: Central Coast of California
 
RichardSM wrote:
Beercat I'm wondering if you are just going to be setting in front row as you stated in an earlier post and not being the paid photographer if a P/S camera is a better bet for you something on the order of the GX1 from Canon it has the zoom ability and wide capabilities to do what you may want, as you say your DSLR with lenses suggested is to much from where you'll be shooting?


Look at my equipment list :wink:

Though I love my Sony RX10's they just don't compare in image quality to my 70D, though they will hold 2.8 at 200mm.

Reply
May 21, 2014 10:35:30   #
floridamet
 
I'm a Nikon user. If I was shooting with Canon, I would only buy L series lenses.
My first choice would be Canon 24-70mm (crop factor of 38mm-112mm) This will give you a lens wide enough for groups and portraits.
I would rent a Canon 70-200mm L f/2.8 (crop factor of 112mm-320mm). Great for portraits.
If you have two bodies, mount one on each body.
Also make sure you have backup batteries, memory cards, bodies and speedlites etc.
The L series is the lenses Canon produces.

Reply
May 21, 2014 10:43:11   #
Beercat Loc: Central Coast of California
 
floridamet wrote:
I'm a Nikon user. If I was shooting with Canon, I would only buy L series lenses.
My first choice would be Canon 24-70mm (crop factor of 38mm-112mm) This will give you a lens wide enough for groups and portraits.
I would rent a Canon 70-200mm L f/2.8 (crop factor of 112mm-320mm). Great for portraits.
If you have two bodies, mount one on each body.
Also make sure you have backup batteries, memory cards, bodies and speedlites etc.
The L series is the lenses Canon produces.


Again notice the equipment list ........ (3) 600 speedlights

I do like the 24-70mm choice thumbup:

Reply
May 21, 2014 10:47:22   #
dsmeltz Loc: Philadelphia
 
The new Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-4 DC Macro (OS)* HSM | C would give you a 28-112 equivalent and is a solid performer

Reply
 
 
May 21, 2014 10:53:47   #
Beercat Loc: Central Coast of California
 
dsmeltz wrote:
The new Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-4 DC Macro (OS)* HSM | C would give you a 28-112 equivalent and is a solid performer


I have a good macro lens 100mm, 160mm cropped, don't want to blow money for something I already have that is similar

Reply
May 21, 2014 10:55:38   #
dsmeltz Loc: Philadelphia
 
Beercat wrote:
I have a good macro lens 100mm, 160mm cropped, don't want to blow money for something I already have that is similar


Confused? 100mm is not similar to 17-70? :shock: :?: :shock: :?:

Reply
May 21, 2014 11:04:33   #
Beercat Loc: Central Coast of California
 
dsmeltz wrote:
Confused? 100mm is not similar to 17-70? :shock: :?: :shock: :?:


They are both Macros. The 100mm works well for detailed shots like rings, shoes and detail in the dress .......

I'd rather choose a lens that was in the same mm range but wasn't a macro

Reply
May 21, 2014 11:15:44   #
dsmeltz Loc: Philadelphia
 
Beercat wrote:
They are both Macros. The 100mm works well for detailed shots like rings, shoes and detail in the dress .......

I'd rather choose a lens that was in the same mm range but wasn't a macro


I think you misunderstand what a macro lens is. The differences, for your purposes, are 1) it has a flatter field than a non macro, so it won't have as much curvature (which is a good thing) and 2)it can focus closer. For macro shooting it can get closer to 1:1, but that is not important for shooting a wedding. But that is about it.

For shooting a wedding, there is no real functional difference between a standard 17-70 zoom and a 17-70 macro. There is nothing a 17-70 non-macro can do that the macro cannot.

Reply
 
 
May 21, 2014 11:20:27   #
Beercat Loc: Central Coast of California
 
dsmeltz wrote:
I think you misunderstand what a macro lens is. The differences, for your purposes, are 1) it has a flatter field than a non macro, so it won't have as much curvature (which is a good thing) and 2)it can focus closer. For macro shooting it can get closer to 1:1, but that is not important for shooting a wedding. But that is about it.

For shooting a wedding, there is no real functional difference between a standard 17-70 zoom and a 17-70 macro. There is nothing a 17-70 non-macro can do that the macro cannot.
I think you misunderstand what a macro lens is. T... (show quote)


Price compared to a non-macro of the same range?

Reply
May 21, 2014 11:25:34   #
floridamet
 
Bearcat
What I said always have backup equipment.
When I shot wedding I used multi lights. You still don't know if one or more will not work.

Reply
May 21, 2014 11:29:12   #
Beercat Loc: Central Coast of California
 
floridamet wrote:
Bearcat
What I said always have backup equipment.
When I shot wedding I used multi lights. You still don't know if one or more will not work.


Got it!

I have 3 cameras for stills, 3 Canon 600 speed lights, tripods, monopods, extra batteries, LCD lights, light/speedlight stands, umbrellas & extra SD cards ... :wink:

Reply
May 21, 2014 11:40:42   #
dsmeltz Loc: Philadelphia
 
Beercat wrote:
Price compared to a non-macro of the same range?


The one I mentioned is around $500.00

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.