Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Mac
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 1095 next>>
May 13, 2024 15:26:37   #
WOW!!!
Go to
May 13, 2024 15:17:15   #
Longshadow wrote:

If it work and meets your needs, stick with it.


I do have a Z 6II that I use, but with all the F-Mount lenses that I have it’s hard to ignore the Df. And those AI/AI-s and AF/ AF-D lenses are really great.
Go to
May 13, 2024 15:05:01   #
Longshadow wrote:
I like my DSLR. It works nicely.

• Are manufacturers gearing towards mirrorless? Killing DSLRs?
• Consumers are jumping on the mirrorless band wagon left and right.
• People will justify mirrorless out the wazoo because they like them.
• Why should I change because someone sees a "problem" with DSLRs?


I still use my 16 MP Df even though it has been discontinued. I use it mostly with fast primes.
Go to
May 13, 2024 14:39:43   #
https://fstoppers.com/gear/case-dslrs-mirrorless-world-667377
Go to
May 11, 2024 09:34:57   #
Canon R wrote:
Taken on Tripod with 24-105 lens at f/11 and iso 100.
Waited for light to be at certain angle for the bridge photo.


I really like the first one.
Go to
May 7, 2024 13:26:41   #
cambriaman wrote:
With the past few days postings it appears this site needs to be re-named: "Guns and Ammo and BTW a Few Words About Photography".

How has this happened? Aren't the editors reviewing postings any longer?

For we photographers it is a waste of bandwidth.


There have been a number of photos of guns in the photo gallery. Since they were titled as photos of guns they are easy to identify. Since I wasn’t interested in looking at them I skipped past them without looking. That is a technique you should try.
Go to
May 5, 2024 16:18:40   #
Rongnongno wrote:
I am not sure if you have noticed by this forum is slowly changing.

Cosmetic (click, animation), it became 'responsive' (Seamlessly adapts to smaller screens) last year or so...

Admin has been busy.




 


My thanks to Admin.
Go to
May 5, 2024 15:36:25   #
User ID wrote:
Its waaaaaaay more than speculation. Its just plain outright OBVIOUS. But you are quantum mechanically correct that theres no *absolute* way of knowing which parallel universe would apply as viewed from within UHH.

Yes its not impossible that if AA was still alive and active that he would shun digital entirely cuz he realizes that he is most marketable as a living fossil, and that role play might require iconoclastic shunning of anything that might, even slightly, diminish the image of live fossil.

IOW, its all about marketing.
Its waaaaaaay more than speculation. Its just plai... (show quote)


It is only more than speculation for people who want to believe that AA would be doing what they are doing.
Go to
May 5, 2024 12:36:20   #
dick ranez wrote:
If Ansel Adams were alive today he would have mastered photoshop and used it as skillfully as he used darkroom techniques to produce images that pleased him.


That is just speculation. There is no way of knowing.
Go to
May 5, 2024 11:26:50   #
bsprague wrote:
Yes, except that that author is arguing that Adobe "threw him under the bus". My argument is that Adobe has provided new tools for me to use at no additional cost. In other words, this is good, not bad.


What Adobe did was give you the tools to “Skip the photoshoot”. That was the point of the article.
Go to
May 4, 2024 21:34:00   #
bsprague wrote:
I had an article to write for a newsletter in our retirement community. It needed an image because all the good articles in the monthly news letter has an image. I want some sort of happy, older person at a beach or in the wilderness with a camera.

I didn't have such an image. I didn't want to shoot such an image. I don't have an account at any stock photo agency. I didn't want any of my neighbors to be identifiable.

Adobe Firefly to the rescue! Before the newsletter people threw me under their bus, I came up with a humorous image that fit the article.

I see it that Adobe provided me with something both fun and useful.
I had an article to write for a newsletter in our ... (show quote)


What you did is exactly what the author was talking about.
Go to
May 4, 2024 21:17:01   #
zarathu wrote:
A little known fact. Ansel Adams spent as much time in the fluids darkroom as any of us do in the digital one. His photos are all heavily modified. Perhaps you knew that.


Yes, but he modified them by using his darkroom skill and talent. Not by clicking a button.
Go to
May 4, 2024 20:11:30   #
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90wPdSt0pwc
Go to
May 4, 2024 13:00:18   #
zarathu wrote:
I started photography by taking what looked like interesting artistic photos in film.

Then I became a wedding and portrait PHOTOGRAPHER in film. Here my work started to blur into art. People never liked their photos and always wanted to look better so I had to arrange light conditions which avoided any stark looks.

After about 6 years as a wedding/portrait PHOTOGRAPHER, I was essentially burned out, and only took travel photos and photos of the kids, returning to being just a photographer.

With the advent of digital, and then increasingly complex digital editing, my photography became PHOTOGRAPHY again. And now, people look at my photos and the first thing they say after “Oh WOW!” is, “Nice Painting....Oh wait, that’s a photograph.... I wonder how he did that."

I have moved into ART. My photographs are the way I want to see the subject, not necessarily the way it is in fact. Mirrorless, focus merge, and extensive digital editing allow me to do this. And, in my mind, I became a PHOTOGRAPHER once again.
I started photography by taking what looked like i... (show quote)



Photography is art at the speed of light.
Go to
May 3, 2024 18:59:37   #
https://petapixel.com/2024/05/03/adobe-throws-photographers-under-the-bus-again-skip-the-photoshoot/
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 1095 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.