Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: TriX
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 1389 next>>
Apr 15, 2024 23:29:50   #
Excellent!
Go to
Apr 15, 2024 23:03:25   #
pj81156 wrote:
And mine for finding it annoying.


Reading anything you find annoying is NOT required - you have a CHOICE.
Go to
Apr 15, 2024 14:16:45   #
AirWalter wrote:
My Persian is doing something weird lately. Every time I finish a meal she likes to get on my lap and then turn around and look at me while pressing on my stomach with one paw and then the other for about 3 or 4 minutes. It hurts!!! I think she is trying to tell me something, but I'm confused.

That supposedly indicates contentment or affection for the person - my cat does it all the time.
Go to
Apr 15, 2024 11:12:12   #
fourlocks wrote:
My cat stares at me like that for no reason, all the time. I ask him "Do you want to go out"? "Do you want food?" "What do you want?"

(no response)

I think he's just messing with me.


Ever try the “slow blink”? If you slowly blink (once or twice) at a cat staring directly at you, if they blink back, it indicates affection (supposedly). It works with my cat almost every time.
Go to
Apr 14, 2024 19:00:06   #
dustie wrote:
The cat in your picture seems slighty miffed at having a mohawk pattern combed between its ears, by the bristles on that toothbrush.


He is an Abbysinian apparently taken up close with a wide lens - their faces aren’t really that wide. Until they get older, they all have that “Mohawk” that looks like it’s been brushed - it fades as they age.
Go to
Apr 14, 2024 13:21:25   #


Go to
Apr 13, 2024 19:35:42   #
tcthome wrote:
This june for win 10. I don't know the answer but, I'm gonna find out when it happens.


Windows 10 support ends October 2025.
Go to
Apr 12, 2024 22:27:12   #
imagemeister wrote:
Yes, I can see It would take a lot of explaining to get through to you people - which I am not going to pursue.....


Exactly my thoughts with respect to you. Go actually shoot some publication worthy indoor sports images and then get back to us. It will become clear to you then.
Go to
Apr 12, 2024 20:41:12   #
imagemeister wrote:
You don't READ so good - I said FF is bad for THIS OP !

FF is not really necessary for anything - unless you are making BIG prints - especially in low light - AND, you have a muscular physique to carry it all AND deep pockets to pay for it.


There is an entire world of professional photographers that can’t believe you’re actually making such a ridiculous statement.
Go to
Apr 12, 2024 20:35:55   #
imagemeister wrote:
Yes, this is the one of the parts that makes no sense at all .......unless it is at night....


Obviously you have not shot indoor sports in a poorly lit gym recently. Give it up. There are those of us that do it regularly and actually know what we are talking about. I wouldn’t presume to give you advice about shooting BIF
Go to
Apr 12, 2024 20:03:20   #
ecblackiii wrote:
Notice that all the graphs displayed show only very recent times (roughly from 1960 onward) that are interpreted to support a crisis narrative, not long-term periods of the Earth's 4.5 billion years of history. They all conceal the fact that CO2 has been as much as 10 times higher in the distant past than it currently is. And the world did not end! They ignore the historical scientific record that actually shows inconsequential temperature change from 300 years ago. And they conceal the fact that the temperatures selected for "climate" studies are taken within large cities, which are "heat islands" that average several degrees hotter (and increasing over time) than in the rural countryside that constitutes the vast majority of the Earth's surface. Finally, they don't show NASA's satellite records that show temperature increases over the oceans are not increasing in relation to land temperatures. If atmospheric CO2 were the climate driver, they would be increasing equally.

Indeed, the "facts" are quite different from what the climate industry and power-centric governments want us to believe. We are being fed only the propaganda intended to create an "existential crisis" that requires massive government expansion and control.
Notice that all the graphs displayed show only ver... (show quote)

Certainly it has been higher, and the world was a very different place - much of the east coast was underwater - want to go there again?

The graphs are focused on the last hundred years, when the amount of automobiles and use of electricity (generated by f****l f**ls) has asymptoted in the industrial age. Can you read the graphs? Do you think the data is false?

No, they are not taken only in “hot cities”. And if you look at the actual data, the ocean temperature IS rising. As a result, the ice packs ARE melting (look at the graphs). If you want real data, go to NOAA and NASA and look at the data directly from the satellites. There you can find all the data you want from rural areas and the oceans - the satellites don’t discriminate.

And no, the historical record is not ignored. Go to NCDC and look at the historical record - they are the largest repository of weather data in the world.

Get some real facts. I hope you’re too intelligent to parrot this hocus pocus and conspiracy theories. We’ll see.
Go to
Apr 12, 2024 19:50:01   #
Sirsnapalot wrote:
I prefer to believe scientists who are not influenced by political money that aren’t afraid of being punished for their honesty.


That would be 99.5% of the REAL climate scientists that work for Universities, National Labs, NOAA, NASA, NCDC (National Climatic Data Center), NCAR (National Climate & Atmospheric Research), who have the best tools in the world at their disposal. I’m guessing that you don’t realize that after nuclear energy, the next largest use of supercomputers in the world is climate modeling. These people are academics, not political hacks like the 0.5% you’ve based your post on who are trying to make $ pn selling conspiracy theories.

Honestly, I’m finding it hard to believe that a rational person believes these conspiracy theories instead of the vast majority of the world’s scientists. Try going to sites like NOAA and NASA that actually have the REAL data, directly from satellites that I posted above. How do you explain those FACTs? One big conspiracy among all the world’s scientists? Do you really believe that?
Go to
Apr 12, 2024 14:36:56   #
MrBob wrote:
What a bunch of baloney... An official who WE elected said the Eclipse was caused by c*****e c****e... Another long term lifer in congress said the moon was primarily gaseous.. We have to LISTEN to our ELECTED reps. whom we have faith in to lead us...


Better to listen to scientists at NOAA, NASA, NCDC, NCAR, etc. who actually have the facts and the education/experience to analyze them
Go to
Apr 12, 2024 13:10:41   #
Be sure to eject that thumb drive before removing - ExFAT is very vulnerable to corruption compared to a more robust file system such as NTFS.
Go to
Apr 12, 2024 13:07:22   #
Not anytime soon. Many users are running Win 7 (~15 years old) and browsers are running just fine. The big change that made XP browsers obsolete was the move from http to https which required SSL and TSL as part of the OS
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 1389 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.