Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: jim hill
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 289 next>>
May 16, 2016 23:16:22   #
PAR4DCR wrote:
You know Jim it was so long ago I don't really remember. I think it was red & white and 4 door.

Don


I know what you mean. Regardless, it was a beautiful machine in any colour and configuration.
Go to
May 15, 2016 19:19:01   #
PAR4DCR wrote:
My first was a 1954 red Chevy. Good work Jim.

Don


Thanks, Don. Appreciate your comment.

All red or did it have a white top? 2 or 4 door?
Go to
May 15, 2016 14:39:06   #
John_F wrote:
My first car was a used 1934 Chevy. Was a high schooler and the War had just ended. Tore the whole engine down and refurbed just about everything. She ran like a top afterwards. Kids can't do that nowadays and don't get to learn much about cars. Sigh.


I wonder what today's kids will be mulling over as the "good ol' days" when they are our age? It's a difficult thing to imagine.
Go to
May 15, 2016 11:26:13   #
abc1234 wrote:
Volo? You probably drove right by me on your way up. I can feel that hard, skinny steering wheel in my hands. And the horn ring. I remember those rear view mirrors which always got knocked off and you could screw a new one on.

I love the composition. Very intimate. I would like to see the picture slightly brighter with a greater tonal range.

Thanks for posting.


I agree - a little lighter probably would be better - especially if your screen is "normal". I think mine is a little bright because when I see the images I post on my wife's laptop they seem to me to be a mite on the dark side.

Thanks for your advice and your comments, I appreciate the critique.
Go to
May 15, 2016 11:20:53   #
Mark7829 wrote:
The image is balanced. Lots of circles. If you wanted it to be perfect, you would need to move to the right a bit so that gauges are fully visible. T in temperature is cut off, as is the E in the fuel gauge. In moving to the right a bit you would have released tension on the Bel Air logo on the dash. As far as the tonal qualities, it is too dark and appears moistly grey. A simple tweak would solve that. As for the perspective, if you wanted to highlight the type of car, I would have focused more on the logos either on the steering wheel or the dash. There was an opportunity to use the mirror to capture people in the background if they where available.

BTW my favorite lens when shooting autos is the fish-eye. I love how its distortions accentuate the focus point.

Lovely image regardless.
The image is balanced. Lots of circles. If you wa... (show quote)


Thanks Mark, Lotsa good ideas. However, as you may know, I rarely try for perfection as by the time it would take to achieve it my feeling for the subject would have been gone along with myself. I'll leave that kind of stuff up to you guys who care about it. My methodology is a kind of a "quick reaction" form of shooting. Where I think it might be helpful I will also use Topaz to varying degrees. In this case it helped create the feeling of the Bel Air logo on the steering column which I felt should be a kind of hazy memory sort of thing. I see and seek a different reality than so called "straight" photographers. The things you have mentioned would probably be of great value to that kind of photography.

However, I am happy to have your comments as they may be of value to other photographers.

I have never used a fish eye lens. Probably never will as I don't see in those terms.

Thanks for looking and commenting - much appreciated.
Go to
May 15, 2016 11:06:30   #
AzPicLady wrote:
Ah yes. I remember that view! When I learned to drive my dad had a 1956 Turquoise Impala. Sweet. He was a car guy.


Is it just me, or do autos these days seem more a less the same. Impala - another great Chevy.
Go to
May 15, 2016 08:05:52   #
neilds37 wrote:
Thank's for bringing back some old memories. My first car was a 1929 Chev, resurrected from a farmers barn. Had low oil pressure until I found and removed a piece of straw in the oil line. 14 high school mates in it at one time going for lunch.


1929 Chevrolet Series AC International. My father owned one and crashed it to a heap in 1939. What a beautiful piece of machinery it was.
Go to
May 14, 2016 20:23:30   #
Frank2013 wrote:
Interesting perspective Mr. Hill.


Thanks, Frank.

Not too sure ho to use the new site yet but I'll learn.
Go to
May 14, 2016 11:55:58   #
larryzplace wrote:
Certainly brings back fond memories... My first car was a white 1959 Chevy Biscayne 6 cyl with 3 on the tree....

I like the way you presented yours :)


The Biscayne fostered a little jealousy on my part. It had better lines, in my opinion, than the Bel Air. It was one of those eras when an elegant style was important. I don't see it today. Maybe the Lincoln??? The Jaguar!

Thanks for your remark. Much appreciated.
Go to
May 14, 2016 11:40:35   #
Dave Chinn wrote:
Oh the memories !!! I reminisce everyday about something Jim. A shot of the whole car would have been nice but I do understand your point.
Dave


I know about those reminiscences. Keeps me thinking about what there is left to do - if that makes any sense. This shot was taken at an auto museum in the upper Chicago burbs.
Go to
May 14, 2016 10:09:49   #
In 1959 I purchased my first car. A 1056 Chevrolet Bel Air, light blue paint job. What a lovely machine it was and just right for the pocket book of a poor man attending Millikin University on the G.I. Bill. I could have photographed the entire thing but I think depicting what I view each time I got into it would be a little different.

I think the spatial aspects have been handled fairly well. A slight touch of Topaz has been added for enhancement.


(Download)
Go to
May 7, 2016 10:06:26   #
Mark7829 wrote:
Jim, I understand your point of view as well. War has a horrific and un-measurable cost. And those that cause it are so removed from those who have to pay for it. The symbolism of the monument outside of photography as a meaning all its own. I was only addressing the photography and never meant to take anything away from men and women who fulfilled their duty to this county.


Mark

Thanks for the clarification. As you may or may not know, I am no slouch when it comes to creating works of artistic merit. When I post something of this nature it's not due to a lack of skill or knowledge. Photography is, however, so much more than that. If you are knowledgeable of the contemporary world of art you are aware that so called "ordinary"
photographs seem to be the rule of the day - not the exception: i.e., Gursky's Rhine II - which recently sold at auction for $4.3 million.

Jim
Go to
May 6, 2016 15:11:46   #
Mark7829 wrote:
Jim, I like the IR but the image not so much. It is an eye level perspective with the backs of several people in a random configuration. It is quite centered, and to be blunt ordinary, liken to a travel pic but with IR. I love the IR and especially the trees in the background. The light is appropriate for the technique but the composition is lacking. I think the emotional element requires greater intimacy, a closer shot with faces, gestures, a leading line with people, a lower or higher and closer perspective. That's just my personal opinion.
Jim, I like the IR but the image not so much. It ... (show quote)


Hiya Mark.

Liked your picture of light. Nice job.

As far as this piece is concerned I realize it's not up to my standards of fine art photography either. It is a snapshot and not a bit above the ordinary.

I very seldom visit this monument. I lost several close friends in the Korean Police action while attached to the 23rd regiment of the 2nd Infantry Division from the 30th medical group as a medic. A temporary assignment. After all these years it's still painful.

I was actually at this location trying to photograph the Vietnam memorial which is about a hundred yards to the north. I noticed these kids offloading from several school buses and congregating around the several monuments at the cemetery. This was one of the shots. It was not my intention to make anything pretty from this monument. It is what it is. It was posted not on artistic merit - it was never intended as such.

Thanks for you perceptive comments and I do understand where you are coming from.

Jim
Go to
May 6, 2016 14:39:49   #
Billyspad wrote:
Great image Jim and yes could be a vain hope. Man seems to almost seek out the opportunity to fight each other
Maybe the only saving grace of having Trump in the
White House is I do not see him trying to impose American type democracy on nations not ready for it. So maybe these kids will be spared. Lets hope so.


Thanks for the compliment Billy. Let's hope we no longer try the folly of imposition of the "American Way."
Go to
May 6, 2016 14:33:40   #
Uuglypher wrote:
Indeed, a powerful memorial...and a meaningful image to me...but my reaction to the image is ...where the hell are some adults to put that day's outing into some meaningful perspective for those kids...not with a talk to the group...but one-on-one...to tie in some of the names, perhaps with families they know today...it doesn't just ....happen...like osmosis....

It reminds me of the Lincoln Memorial...Parents and kids marveling at the great sculpture of the towering, seated Lincoln....but few if any read the words of his 2nd inaugural address on the wall.... and even fewer actually discuss their meaning with their kids..... how are the kids to get an inkling of what is actually memorialized?

Thanks Dave, I know what you mean.

Good image, Jim, and obviously...it speaks to me.....

O.K....off the soapbox...
Dave
Indeed, a powerful memorial...and a meaningful ima... (show quote)
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 289 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.