Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: TriX
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 1386 next>>
Apr 28, 2024 17:50:15   #
llamb wrote:
Wow! Did we ever miss you.

Now get busy and post, post, post!

~Lee and all your fans


Yes indeed! Or in the words of Little Feat:

They all asked about you
Down on the farm
The cows asked, the pigs asked
The horses asked, too
All want to know why to the city
You moved, changed your name to Kitty
What's come over you?
It ain't true; it ain't true, Linda Lou
Say it ain't true, Linda Lou
It ain't true; it ain't true, Linda Lou
Say it ain't true, Linda Lou
They's all bawling 'bout you
Down on the farm
The cows bawl, the pigs bawl
The horses bawl, too
Miss you so much that crying's
All we can do
Weeping and wailing, praying
You'll come home soon…
Go to
Apr 28, 2024 17:47:41   #
bobbyjohn wrote:
While AI is an interesting technology in the world of photos, videos, search engines, advertising, etc. etc., and with a myriad of legal and ethical concerns, it is my belief that there is NO SUCH THING as Artificial Intelligence.

I have used AI to produce strange and weird images, and will likely continue to do so...because it's fun!

Before retirement, I was in the IT field for many decades, and back even in the 2000's, the term and delivery of AI was in its infancy. It was the belief then, as now, that AI is produced by humans, humans writing computer programs, and as such takes on the characteristics and leanings of its authors/developers. A computer cannot think, it is just a series of 0's and 1's, created by some human, with a myriad of IF-THEN-ELSE logic. A computer cannot have emotions. When an AI deliverer want his program to react in a certain way, he programs it that way...it is a reflection of the developer. Such it is with AI that has permeated the world today.

While the term and delivery of AI is here to stay, we should always remember that in using AI, we are catering to the whims of the developer(s). We should not assign "intelligence" to a machine that can have no intelligence.
While AI is an interesting technology in the world... (show quote)


I prefer the term “machine learning”.

It goes back a lot further than 2000. In 1980, when I was at Tektronix, we marketed a HW AI platform and an object oriented programming language specifically for machine learning called SmallTalk. It was not a marketing success - too far ahead of its time.
Go to
Apr 26, 2024 22:09:31   #
At the moment, I’m watching the classic “Earth vs the Flying Saucers”. This version has been colorized - I think I prefer the B&W.
Go to
Apr 26, 2024 11:25:19   #
jerryc41 wrote:
You probably already know a lot about this, but the Smithsonian has a good video about the nuclear tests in Nevada in the 1950s. They did 100 above ground tests and a dozen below ground. It attracted huge crowds of tourists to witness this free entertainment. In ten days, they set off five bombs. It was interesting seeing all the work that went into these tests, like building an entire town to see what might survive. I'm not sure what streaming service I used last night, but it's worth a look.

https://www.google.com/search?q=smithsonian+video+nevada+nuclear+tests&oq=smithsonian+video+nevada+nuclear+tests&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOTIKCAEQABiABBiiBDIKCAIQABiABBiiBNIBCTEwMTAzajBqMagCALACAQ&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
You probably already know a lot about this, but th... (show quote)


When I was at Tektronix in the 70s, we built the worlds fastest transient digitizer, the R7912, which had a single shot capability of 100 GSamples/sec with 9 bit resolution (!) and cost north of 60k$ each in the early 70s if memory serves. Each time there was an underground nuclear test, the AEA blew up 20-30 of them inside the cavern. As the blast occurred, the digitizer recorded the EMP and was then vaporized, with the data moving at over 1/2 light speed down the cable from the cavern to the recorders as the cable was being vaporized right behind it. Each blast was a big commission payday for the Tek sales engineer for Nevada.
Go to
Apr 25, 2024 21:13:47   #
JoeBiker wrote:
That is not correct. The SIM card primarily holds the phone number and the ability to use it. It is possible to store a few contacts on the SIM card, but most (android) phones don't do that by default. Other data such as pictures could be stored on a SD card, but most android phones don't do that by default (and iPhones don't support internal SD cards).

Moving the SIM to the new phone "should" move the phone number and the ability to use it to the new phone. But, a few caveats: the new phone must be unlocked. Also (a little harder to explain), but for best results, the new phone must support the protocols and should be optimized for the frequencies used by the carrier in your country. Look on the description of the new phone to make sure that it is compatible with your cell phone company and country. If you get a phone that is optimized for a different region (like Asia), it will probably work where the cell coverage is strong, but may not work well where the cell coverage is weak.

Also, you have to make sure that your new phone has a SIM slot in the first place. Some newer phones (some versions of the Samsung S23+, for example) only support eSIM (electronic SIM: a soft copy of the SIM data), and don't even have a SIM slot.
That is not correct. The SIM card primarily holds ... (show quote)


Very informative! Thanks.
Go to
Apr 25, 2024 20:46:14   #
Basil wrote:
Samsung 990 Pro in appropriate high speed enclosure.


Right answer (or a slower but more portable Samsung T-9)
Go to
Apr 23, 2024 20:44:19   #
lamiaceae wrote:
... I guess I may be the only one on the Hog that listens to Radio.


You are not. Im addition to short wave stations, ham radio and satellite/space communications, I regularly listen to NPR. Radio is magic - a window to the world.
Go to
Apr 22, 2024 23:35:19   #
selmslie wrote:
Cibachrome was tolerable considering what we could get from Kodachrome slides. I still have a couple of prints that have never faded after 40 years.

But I scanned the original slides and the results are just as good.

Loved Cibachrome - beautiful ultra long lasting media. I stopped doing color when Cibachrome paper and chemicals became unavailable - no interest in Kodacolor prints although I still have a color darkroom. The reason I asked about the 2 part C-41 process is that I have a lot of 120 Fuji Velvia and NPS that’s been in the fridge for years that I may go shoot, develop and scan if I can simplify the developer/bleach/fix (or blix)/stabilizer process. I agree the bleach was nasty stuff, even with good ventilation - wonder if the 2 part bleach is as bad.
Go to
Apr 22, 2024 19:22:16   #
Muddyvalley wrote:
Roger Corman

Sorry, you are correct.

Just rewatching Forbidden Planet on TCM (for at least the 4th or 5th time)
Go to
Apr 22, 2024 19:21:24   #
planepics wrote:
I listen to the radio on a daily basis. My personal favorites are a jazz station broadcast by a local university and NPR, who had 3 hybrid digital stations, the "normal" one, a jazz station and a classical station. I sometimes listen to other stations through my Denon receiver "Tune-in" app. you can search by type of music or location - some stations overseas are broadcast in English and some in the native language...Greece is fun to listen to, or Hawai'i.


Let me suggest the Radio Garden ap (free) for simple to navigate thousands of streaming stations all over the world. Just pick a location from the world map, and a list of statins and the type of music appears, then just click on your selection to listen in real time. I’m finding that music from areas where European and Middle Eastern music intersect, such as Turkey, are interesting.
Go to
Apr 22, 2024 19:11:06   #
Has anyone tried the CineStill 2 bath C-41 color negative processing chemicals? I’ve usually used the 4-5 chemical process, but this is getting excellent reviews and the pricing is very reasonable.
https://cinestillfilm.com/products/cs41-simplified-color-processing-at-home-quart-kit-c-41-chemistry?variant=30376678593
Go to
Apr 22, 2024 18:59:04   #
As long as we’re discussing film, has anyone tried the CineStill 2 bath C-41 color negative processing chemicals? I’ve usually used the 4-5 chemical process, but this is getting excellent reviews and the pricing is very reasonable.
https://cinestillfilm.com/products/cs41-simplified-color-processing-at-home-quart-kit-c-41-chemistry?variant=30376678593
Go to
Apr 22, 2024 12:04:49   #
I’ll just add that to my eye, the resolution from my medium format film camera (Mamiya RB67 Pro S) is superior to any of my digital cameras. Plus for B&W, personally, I prefer the look of a silver halide print. I do shoot mostly digital, but, I still have my film cameras and darkroom.
Go to
Apr 18, 2024 23:30:04   #
Let me suggest Attack of the Crab Monsters (on You Tube) directed by Harvey Corman no less.
Go to
Apr 18, 2024 20:39:20   #
TriX wrote:
Not to butt in, but to minimize wear on your vinyl, I’d try 1-1/2 G if your arm and cartridge will track at that weight. If not, try 2G.


Please ignore - missed your second sentence that you had sold it before I replied
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 1386 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.