Posts for: Racmanaz
May 8, 2024 02:39:12 #
McKinneyMike wrote:
LOL... Big Daddy likes to be spanked! Who didn't see that one coming (See Helsinki). He is a bad boy.....
Michael Avenatti DEFENDS Trump, Calls Stormy Daniels a Liar
Wow, to think that the Lefties on here just couldn't wait to hear from this guy.
https://thehill.com/video/michael-avenatti-defends-trump-calls-stormy-daniels-a-liar-interview/9593909/
Trump foe Avenatti says ex-president ‘a victim of the system’ in N.Y. case: ‘I am deeply disturbed’
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/apr/22/michael-avenatti-says-donald-trump-victim-system-n/
May 7, 2024 22:09:04 #
Wyantry wrote:
Which is why those who are not SURE are Agnostic.
Agnosticism is more rational than both the other sides really. That is if they both claim that God exist, or God does not exist.
May 7, 2024 21:05:21 #
srg wrote:
Lol. Don't ever stop posting. You are very entertaining and you make me feel so smart.
Well, I always love making low IQ uneducated people feel smart. That only means you’re learning a lot from me.
May 7, 2024 18:20:51 #
Robertl594 wrote:
I just figured it out. Rac is not a human. He is a trolbot. No one can be that much of a putz and know how to breathe. Has to be a computer. They had us going for a moment. 😂
lol says irrational atheist who makes claims he cannot back up. Talk about being a putz
May 7, 2024 15:47:29 #
Well no, nobody can prove that God exist, except for himself should he should exist Which I do believe that he does.
https://youtu.be/ISUynYz93zY?si=pG6juHOlM_UaaO9-
https://youtu.be/ISUynYz93zY?si=pG6juHOlM_UaaO9-
May 7, 2024 15:37:48 #
JohnFrim wrote:
Thanks for YOUR views on those topics. br br Inte... (show quote)
Pure nonsense, I don’t have any difficulties Honest answers. That’s all I do is answer honestly. Just because I didn’t answer all your “20,000 questions” doesn’t mean any of what you claim.
May 7, 2024 13:21:33 #
srg wrote:
We know so much about you raQ. For instance, you work for the entities that wish to destroy our way of life.
And that you are not a lawyer, since you do not understand the meaning of the word "evidence"
And that you are not a lawyer, since you do not understand the meaning of the word "evidence"
Lol here we are another conspiracy theorist projecting his conspiracy tendencies on me
May 7, 2024 12:49:06 #
ArtzDarkroom wrote:
I could care less. You do you, I'll do the same.
OK, then why keep bringing up the subject of God? You do you and I’ll do the same. Stop being such a hypocrite.
May 7, 2024 12:48:33 #
pendennis wrote:
It's not irrational to claim that something does not exist, when there's no evidence to the contrary.
I assert that there are no leprechauns. If you believe there are, you are bound by logic to prove that there are. It's no more complicated than that.
I can assert that there was no creation by a superior being. I don't have to provide prove that there wasn't. You, on the other hand, have to prove that a superior being created everything and ignore the science of evolution.
I assert that there are no leprechauns. If you believe there are, you are bound by logic to prove that there are. It's no more complicated than that.
I can assert that there was no creation by a superior being. I don't have to provide prove that there wasn't. You, on the other hand, have to prove that a superior being created everything and ignore the science of evolution.
Yes it is irrational to make a definitive claim that something does not exist when you don’t have all the evidence and all the knowledge there is to know in the universe. Now it’s more rational to say you don’t believe there is a God because you don’t see the evidence but the claim that there is no God is irrational. It’s the same way with those who believe in God, If they make The definitive claim that God exists, even If the claim is true, it’s still irrational because they can not know that for certain. It’s more rational to say you believe there is a God or you believe there isn’t a God.
May 7, 2024 12:45:46 #
Robertl594 wrote:
There you go again. You are such a waste of time. You have reached my daily limit of tolerance of you. Until tomorrow. I am now going to the flat earthers site for some more entertainment.
Oh poor Karen got offended that I confronted your juvenile behavior.
May 7, 2024 11:07:55 #
ArtzDarkroom wrote:
Rac,
Yes, I'm a big fan of Fantasy/Sci-Fi literature, which I often compare to the Bible stories. I don't care about any god or if anybody else loves their explanation of the god created Cosmos. To each their own. Some people here believe in fantasies too. lol
Art
Yes, I'm a big fan of Fantasy/Sci-Fi literature, which I often compare to the Bible stories. I don't care about any god or if anybody else loves their explanation of the god created Cosmos. To each their own. Some people here believe in fantasies too. lol
Art
Maybe atheism is a fantasy as well.
May 7, 2024 11:07:00 #
Robertl594 wrote:
I was just referencing tRumps instruction about grabbing felines 
tRump? What are you 14 years old?
May 7, 2024 10:18:59 #
Kraken wrote:
What a dumb post, did you just wake up?
What a dumb response from you, are you still comatose?
May 7, 2024 10:10:42 #
ArtzDarkroom wrote:
I rejected the fairly tale after my Confirmation b... (show quote)
For someone who claims he does not believe in God, you sure talk about him a lot. Do you have a habit of talking about what you call “fairytales” ?
May 7, 2024 09:45:42 #
pendennis wrote:
I stated that God did not exist, because there's no proof-positive he(she) does. It's incumbent on the person(s) who allege that he/she does to provide that proof. So far, respondents have only been able to provide their spiritual beliefs, no positive proof.
You're half right and you're half wrong. The first part of your response is definitely wrong.